<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enabling freedom and openness with Mozilla?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openbuddha.com/2009/06/17/enabling-freedom-and-openness-with-mozilla/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openbuddha.com/2009/06/17/enabling-freedom-and-openness-with-mozilla/</link>
	<description>Open Source Buddhism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:21:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.openbuddha.com/2009/06/17/enabling-freedom-and-openness-with-mozilla/comment-page-1/#comment-500242</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbuddha.com/?p=2805#comment-500242</guid>
		<description>Hey there. I thought Mixmaster had actually died. I haven&#039;t heard much about it in years.

Thunderbird 3, which should be out in a few months, has a GREATLY eased system for writing add-ons for it (much more like Firefox 2 and 3 has). That should make things easier in that space for people that want to do things with TB. 

I hadn&#039;t heard of the Pynchon Gate before. I will have to do a google dig and find information on it 

I&#039;m happy to help people with projects by doing QA on stuff. I&#039;m a pretty crappy coder (as I tell people) so I can&#039;t write much of this sort of thing on my own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there. I thought Mixmaster had actually died. I haven&#8217;t heard much about it in years.</p>
<p>Thunderbird 3, which should be out in a few months, has a GREATLY eased system for writing add-ons for it (much more like Firefox 2 and 3 has). That should make things easier in that space for people that want to do things with TB. </p>
<p>I hadn&#8217;t heard of the Pynchon Gate before. I will have to do a google dig and find information on it </p>
<p>I&#8217;m happy to help people with projects by doing QA on stuff. I&#8217;m a pretty crappy coder (as I tell people) so I can&#8217;t write much of this sort of thing on my own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlp</title>
		<link>http://www.openbuddha.com/2009/06/17/enabling-freedom-and-openness-with-mozilla/comment-page-1/#comment-500240</link>
		<dc:creator>mlp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbuddha.com/?p=2805#comment-500240</guid>
		<description>Torbutton is a good start, though it would be especially awesome to be able to fire off a one-click Tor &lt;em&gt;server&lt;/em&gt; using it. 

The remailer network is still alive and well, but Mixmaster isn&#039;t the easiest thing in the world to configure. The next-generation remailer, Mixminion, has a completed protocol, but I don&#039;t know how close it is to being deployable; Nick Mathewson or Len Sassaman would be good people to talk to about that. I don&#039;t have any idea how to incorporate this into Firefox, but a remailer network plugin for Thunderbird could be cool.

Moving a little farther out into the theoretical space, there&#039;s an excellent design for an information-theoretically secure pseudonymous email system that Len and Nick published with Bram Cohen back in 2005, The Pynchon Gate. The paper has been turned into a protocol spec, and it&#039;s ready to be implemented, but this hasn&#039;t actually been done yet. If you know of anyone who would be interested, let&#039;s talk. (I&#039;d do it myself but I all kinds of do not have the time.) Setting up a Pynchon network and building a Thunderbird plugin to use it would be pretty awesome.

I think you&#039;ve got my email (if not, shout out to me on the noisebridge list and I&#039;ll hit you back); let&#039;s talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Torbutton is a good start, though it would be especially awesome to be able to fire off a one-click Tor <em>server</em> using it. </p>
<p>The remailer network is still alive and well, but Mixmaster isn&#8217;t the easiest thing in the world to configure. The next-generation remailer, Mixminion, has a completed protocol, but I don&#8217;t know how close it is to being deployable; Nick Mathewson or Len Sassaman would be good people to talk to about that. I don&#8217;t have any idea how to incorporate this into Firefox, but a remailer network plugin for Thunderbird could be cool.</p>
<p>Moving a little farther out into the theoretical space, there&#8217;s an excellent design for an information-theoretically secure pseudonymous email system that Len and Nick published with Bram Cohen back in 2005, The Pynchon Gate. The paper has been turned into a protocol spec, and it&#8217;s ready to be implemented, but this hasn&#8217;t actually been done yet. If you know of anyone who would be interested, let&#8217;s talk. (I&#8217;d do it myself but I all kinds of do not have the time.) Setting up a Pynchon network and building a Thunderbird plugin to use it would be pretty awesome.</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;ve got my email (if not, shout out to me on the noisebridge list and I&#8217;ll hit you back); let&#8217;s talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JZ</title>
		<link>http://www.openbuddha.com/2009/06/17/enabling-freedom-and-openness-with-mozilla/comment-page-1/#comment-499288</link>
		<dc:creator>JZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbuddha.com/?p=2805#comment-499288</guid>
		<description>I edited my original post to point here -- I&#039;d love to see tools built into Firefox along these lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I edited my original post to point here &#8212; I&#8217;d love to see tools built into Firefox along these lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.openbuddha.com/2009/06/17/enabling-freedom-and-openness-with-mozilla/comment-page-1/#comment-498793</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbuddha.com/?p=2805#comment-498793</guid>
		<description>A friend of mine replied on Facebook about adding support for Darknets:

&quot;I don&#039;t know if Tor is the end-all-be-all, but the basic point would be: browser-based, quasi-auto-configuring anonymous darknets (that set up and tear down without a trace), and look something like other (e.g. HTTP) traffic would be a boon to free speech.

Until the government decided that it was aiding and abetting pedophilia, and banned it. Thankfully the first amendment does not apply there.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine replied on Facebook about adding support for Darknets:</p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t know if Tor is the end-all-be-all, but the basic point would be: browser-based, quasi-auto-configuring anonymous darknets (that set up and tear down without a trace), and look something like other (e.g. HTTP) traffic would be a boon to free speech.</p>
<p>Until the government decided that it was aiding and abetting pedophilia, and banned it. Thankfully the first amendment does not apply there.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
