<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MailCo for MoFo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openbuddha.com/2007/09/17/mailco-for-mofo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openbuddha.com/2007/09/17/mailco-for-mofo/</link>
	<description>Open Source Buddhism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:18:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.openbuddha.com/2007/09/17/mailco-for-mofo/comment-page-1/#comment-84829</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcanology.com/2007/09/17/mailco-for-mofo/#comment-84829</guid>
		<description>Hi Tim,

The e-mail all has to live somewhere, whether it is Gmail or your local ISP or something, so even on phones and the like, some of this is always relevant. 

I do agree about going beyond. From what I&#039;ve seen said, David Ascher wants the new Mailco to do a major rev of Thunderbird (like Thunderbird 3) but to also explorer next generation messaging, not necessarily as part of Thunderbird but maybe as a new program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tim,</p>
<p>The e-mail all has to live somewhere, whether it is Gmail or your local ISP or something, so even on phones and the like, some of this is always relevant. </p>
<p>I do agree about going beyond. From what I&#8217;ve seen said, David Ascher wants the new Mailco to do a major rev of Thunderbird (like Thunderbird 3) but to also explorer next generation messaging, not necessarily as part of Thunderbird but maybe as a new program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timfry</title>
		<link>http://www.openbuddha.com/2007/09/17/mailco-for-mofo/comment-page-1/#comment-84726</link>
		<dc:creator>timfry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcanology.com/2007/09/17/mailco-for-mofo/#comment-84726</guid>
		<description>The question remains as to whether in this day and age of solid webmail applications, phones that do email, and work email accounts to whether or not an OE or Thunderbird is necessary.  I wish the new MailCo well - I want it to succeed and am actually more excited about its possibilities than Firefox (which is probably attributable to how well it has succeeded already).  But the company needs to go in an entirely different way in my opinion than simply rehashing (and improving) the tired old mail program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question remains as to whether in this day and age of solid webmail applications, phones that do email, and work email accounts to whether or not an OE or Thunderbird is necessary.  I wish the new MailCo well &#8211; I want it to succeed and am actually more excited about its possibilities than Firefox (which is probably attributable to how well it has succeeded already).  But the company needs to go in an entirely different way in my opinion than simply rehashing (and improving) the tired old mail program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tysgodhi</title>
		<link>http://www.openbuddha.com/2007/09/17/mailco-for-mofo/comment-page-1/#comment-49132</link>
		<dc:creator>tysgodhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcanology.com/2007/09/17/mailco-for-mofo/#comment-49132</guid>
		<description>Hey Al,

I hope any &quot;dovetail&quot; with Outlook doesn&#039;t end up making Thunderbird slow, overly complex, or prone to hanging up waiting for something to time out.  One of TB&#039;s best aspects has been its independence from windows, so it works cleanly and quickly.  The only situation I&#039;ve ever seen Outlook work well in is a corporate setup where everyone&#039;s machine is the same, and Microsoft stuff is used for everything.

W.B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Al,</p>
<p>I hope any &#8220;dovetail&#8221; with Outlook doesn&#8217;t end up making Thunderbird slow, overly complex, or prone to hanging up waiting for something to time out.  One of TB&#8217;s best aspects has been its independence from windows, so it works cleanly and quickly.  The only situation I&#8217;ve ever seen Outlook work well in is a corporate setup where everyone&#8217;s machine is the same, and Microsoft stuff is used for everything.</p>
<p>W.B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
