<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtualization and QA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openbuddha.com/2007/07/02/virtualization-and-qa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openbuddha.com/2007/07/02/virtualization-and-qa/</link>
	<description>Open Source Buddhism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:21:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.openbuddha.com/2007/07/02/virtualization-and-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-450265</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcanology.com/2007/07/02/virtualization-and-qa/#comment-450265</guid>
		<description>I currently have a 450 Gb library of VMs that my users manually copy from tje library to VM systems when needed.  Does anyone have any better ideas for how to make common VMs available and easily disrtibute them to test systems when needed? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I currently have a 450 Gb library of VMs that my users manually copy from tje library to VM systems when needed.  Does anyone have any better ideas for how to make common VMs available and easily disrtibute them to test systems when needed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.openbuddha.com/2007/07/02/virtualization-and-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-450261</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcanology.com/2007/07/02/virtualization-and-qa/#comment-450261</guid>
		<description>Does anyone have any hardware recomendations for taking a desktop vistualization to a more centralized VM infrastructure?  I like th independance of separate systems for testers to use, but I also like the power that a centralized server can use.  I see risks with a centralized server and turf battles over resources, and separate desktops being underpowered for certain VM environments. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have any hardware recomendations for taking a desktop vistualization to a more centralized VM infrastructure?  I like th independance of separate systems for testers to use, but I also like the power that a centralized server can use.  I see risks with a centralized server and turf battles over resources, and separate desktops being underpowered for certain VM environments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abillings@mozilla.com</title>
		<link>http://www.openbuddha.com/2007/07/02/virtualization-and-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-33287</link>
		<dc:creator>abillings@mozilla.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 15:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcanology.com/2007/07/02/virtualization-and-qa/#comment-33287</guid>
		<description>Thanks! I may do that. I&#039;ve just been happy to find out that they compress down well when zipped. I was afraid of eating up too much disk space storing these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! I may do that. I&#8217;ve just been happy to find out that they compress down well when zipped. I was afraid of eating up too much disk space storing these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: preed@mozilla.com</title>
		<link>http://www.openbuddha.com/2007/07/02/virtualization-and-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-33286</link>
		<dc:creator>preed@mozilla.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 09:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcanology.com/2007/07/02/virtualization-and-qa/#comment-33286</guid>
		<description>Let me know if you ever run into any problems with VMware or have any questions on how to set stuff up. I do the reference platform stuff on the build side; I think I got &quot;stuck&quot; with it because I worked at VMware before MoCo. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me know if you ever run into any problems with VMware or have any questions on how to set stuff up. I do the reference platform stuff on the build side; I think I got &#8220;stuck&#8221; with it because I worked at VMware before MoCo. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Kairys</title>
		<link>http://www.openbuddha.com/2007/07/02/virtualization-and-qa/comment-page-1/#comment-33285</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Kairys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 09:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arcanology.com/2007/07/02/virtualization-and-qa/#comment-33285</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using VMware for quite some time now for Mozilla QA purposes. I find it far more convenient to simply reload a VM from a snapshot so the OS is back to its original configuration so testing can be done on the same set of data as it was previously. My previous setup was using a dual boot method which got rather messy within a few days of testing Firefox trunk builds with the annoyance of switching between Windows and Linux constantly.

My only problem at the moment with virtualisation is the lack of memory in my machine to efficiently run more than one VM at a time although I&#039;m hoping to get my hands on some extra memory in the next few days to resolve that problem. Aside from that minor inconvenience I find virtualisation a very useful and effective means for testing in different environments. Definitely the way to go for QA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using VMware for quite some time now for Mozilla QA purposes. I find it far more convenient to simply reload a VM from a snapshot so the OS is back to its original configuration so testing can be done on the same set of data as it was previously. My previous setup was using a dual boot method which got rather messy within a few days of testing Firefox trunk builds with the annoyance of switching between Windows and Linux constantly.</p>
<p>My only problem at the moment with virtualisation is the lack of memory in my machine to efficiently run more than one VM at a time although I&#8217;m hoping to get my hands on some extra memory in the next few days to resolve that problem. Aside from that minor inconvenience I find virtualisation a very useful and effective means for testing in different environments. Definitely the way to go for QA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
